Showing posts with label WACO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WACO. Show all posts

Friday, January 4, 2013

Southwest Pilots Having Fun

Long before Soutwest Airlines' blue 737s became a ubiquitous sight at Los Angeles International Airport, LAX had a different name, Mines Field, and there was a company called Southwest Aviation based there.

The airfield was named after the real estate agent, William Mines, who arranged for the city to buy the farmland that became the airport. The land was acquired in 1928, the first hangar built in 1929 and the airfield officially opened in 1930. It kept the name until it became Los Angeles Airport in 1941.

Somewhere during those ten years, then, these two photos were taken. I have not, however, been able to find out any information on Southwest Aviation (for instance, the most complete list of companies based at Mines that I could find is on the Davis-Monthan web page about the field). From the photos, I'd guess that it was at least a flying school...because these two characters posing with a WACO GXE certainly look like an instructor and student!

Any information on the company would be appreciated!


Friday, September 14, 2012

The Girl and the GXE

This very small print was buried in a box of "junk" photos at a swap meet, and both the presence of the girl posing on the tire, and the location at the beach intrigued me. I have no idea if this is one of the early aviatrixes, or just some gal who wanted her photo taken with the plane (maybe she'd gone for a joy ride in it?).

The registration, NC747E indicates that it was WACO GXE (aka WACO 10) serial number 1986,  the most popular type of WACO built, with 1,623 produced between 1927 and 1933.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Packets and WACOs

The first of today's three images is probably a staged Air
Force publicity shot.
At first glance, you might think that this was a photo of a Fairchild C-119 Flying Boxcar. At first glance at this small image, that's what I thought. But a careful look reveals that it's not. Rather, this is a Fairchild C-82A Packet, one of only 223 that were built between 1945 and 1948, and for today's post, we have three unrelated images that all feature the C-82.

The Packet, unfortunately, was somewhat of a failure. It was underpowered, and the design of the fuselage made it less than ideal for the cargo it was intended to carry. The Air Force wasn't happy, and asked Fairchild to redesign the aircraft. Initially designated the XC-82B, the redesign utilized larger engines, and the cockpit was moved forward, freeing up cargo space. Now happy, the Air Force ordered this new version into production as the better-known C-119 Flying Boxcar, and over 1,100 were built.

This image is clearly a staged scene, rather 
than a personal, impromptu snap. The 
aircraft is way too shiny for an in-service 
cargo bird, the crewmen are a little too
cleanly dressed and positioned, and when 
unloading such cargo,  no one in their right 
might would park the plane diagonally on 
the taxiway.
Despite its shortcomings, the C-82 did achieve a level of immortality as a movie star in the original 1965 production of The Flight of the Phoenix. One flying and two wrecked airframes were used in the making of the film. The 2004 remake of the movie, however, featured a C-119.

But what is especially interesting about two of these  photos is what's in their backgrounds. One of the C-82's roles was that of glider tow. During the war, WACO built over 13,000 CG-4 troop gliders, which were towed into combat behind transports such as the C-46 and C-47.

Today's second image shows a much more candid scene. The
troops are doing their job without nice white uniforms and the
photo's composition indicates a quick, on-the-fly snap. Also
note that this is probably an older image, as there is no Air
Force lettering on the plane, and the insignia is the older version
The glider shown above was the follow-on version, the WACO CG-15, later redesignated the G-15 after the Army Air Corps became the USAF in 1947. Though smaller than the CG-4, the G-15 carried the same number of troops - 15 to 16 - but its smaller wingspan allowed a higher maximum airspeed of 180 knots, to accommodate being towed behind newer, faster transports like the C-82A.

But with the end of the war, it became clear that large troop-carrying gliders were no longer relevant, and the production contract was cancelled, with only 473 aircraft built. Only one complete G-15 fuselage has survived the years, and is awaiting restoration at the WACO Museum and Aviation Learning Center at the historic WACO Field, Troy, Ohio. (Images of the current condition of the airframe can be seen here - you'll have to scroll about 3/4 down the page.)

Lastly for this week is this image of three GIs. Handwritten inscription on the back of the photo says "Last day at Benning." No idea who these three are, but what I found interesting (and why I acquired the photo) are the three C-82s in the background which are in various stages of disassembly.

If anyone has stories of what the aircraft were utilized for at Fort Benning, please share!

Friday, January 13, 2012

Snapshots from Mt Tom Airport

I know almost nothing about these three images...the first two shown both have hand-written on the back "Mt. Tom Airport, May, 1929". The third was from the same source, but has nothing written on it, so I'm not sure whether it actually was from the same place.

Where was Mt. Tom Airport? Not sure about that, either. There are a number of mountains named that, notably one in eastern California and one in Massachusetts. If you google Mt. Tom Airport, the closest thing that comes up is Oscoda County Airport on Mt. Tom Road in Mio, Michigan.

The first image (above) shows a WACO GXE, serial 1362, but there's little information contained in the old registration data bases. The aircraft type was originally known as a WACO 10, but was redesignated after 1928 as GXE, so this would tend to suggest that the plane in our photo was built after 1928.

I'm not entirely sure what type of aircraft is shown in the second image (left), so if any reader can identify it, please comment below!

Lastly is the plane below, which has a Curtiss-esque look to it. Again, I have no clue what it is, so if you can identify it, let me know.